🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. In-network. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. EPO. Point of Service. HDHP. HSA. FSA. HRA. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? You should be. Who understands this complex system? Not the typical entrepreneur. Neither the average worker. Choosing the right medical coverage for our business – or for our families – appears to require demands a PhD in medical insurance.

The Medical System Isn't Just Complex, It Is Expensive

Based on recent research, typical households spends $27,000 annually on medical coverage (up 6% compared to last year). The average employer health insurance cost is expected to surpass $17,000 per employee in 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Currently federal operations has ceased functioning because partisan disputes regarding subsidies which analysts predict could cause a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage here in America? I have to believe we're getting closer since this can't continue.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm proposing for our current Medicare program – an insurance system – merely extend to cover everyone. Our infrastructure doesn't change. The way medical professionals receive payment would change. Believe me, they'll adapt.

How Universal Coverage Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would require payments from workers and companies. In similar programs, an employee making moderate income pays approximately five point three percent toward medical coverage. The company pays approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear like a lot? Not if you compare that with what the typical US resident spends. I know multiple businesses who are easily contributing between eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages for medical benefits. And keep in mind that in comprehensive systems, those payments include pension plans, sick pay, maternity leave and unemployment benefits in addition to funding healthcare facilities. When including those costs compared with our current spending on retirement programs, job loss coverage and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Implementation for America

In the US, a national health premium would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a framework that is already in place. It ought to be means-based – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. There would be both an employee and company payments. And, like many our government's defense, IT, welfare services and infrastructure, the system could be managed to third-party administrators rather than a government office.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program represents a huge benefit for small businesses like mine. It would place us on a level playing field with our larger competitors who can afford superior coverage. It would render management much easier (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to retirement and Medicare taxes, instead of separate payments to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would make simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, instead of enduring the complicated (and ineffective) process of negotiating with the big insurance providers required annually each year. Due to simplification, there would be improved comprehension about benefits among workers – contrasted with existing arrangements which require them to interpret the complications of existing plans. Additionally there would definitely exist less liability for companies since we wouldn't have access to workers' health histories for risk assessment and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as possible. But I've learned that public institutions play important functions in society, including national security to supporting needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone through a national insurance system enhances economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for small businesses that employ the majority of American employees and fund half the economic output. It enables for workers to enjoy better health, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Exist a million considerations I'm not addressing? Certainly. Given all the healthcare cost increases we've seen in recent years, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning effectively. I understand that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms are easier to implement. But expanding universal Medicare, even with increased taxation required, would remain a superior and more affordable strategy both for controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, we need to tone down national pride. Our healthcare system isn't so great. We rank well below numerous nations with the best healthcare globally, based on comprehensive research. Perhaps a positive aspect amid present circumstances is that we take serious examination in the mirror and agree that big changes need to happen.