By Ending a Harsh Conservative Welfare Policy, This Budget Definitively Sets Out How Labour Will Fight the Battle to Revitalize Britain

Yesterday, the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, delivered a Labour Party budget. People have been asking for Labour’s mission and values to be more clearly articulated. By way of the choices made – a transition to a more equitable tax system, targeting wealth to fund addressing child poverty, quality public services and the cost of living – we have clearly demonstrated what we believe in.

That’s why Labour MPs cheered in the Commons, and it’s why we are ready for the fights to come. And it’s why the cries from the conservative side began right away.

The Main Dividing Line in UK Politics

The central dividing line in British politics is yet again on the economy. On the one hand Labour, who aim to change it so it helps ordinary working people, and on the opposite side, our political opponents, who support the current system and the unsuccessful doctrine of the past. We must now take on, and prevail in, the argument.

The Tories had 14 years to resolve things and in reality, by every standard, they got much worse. Their ideological austerity and supply-side economics – tax cuts for the wealthy, reducing investment (leaving us with poor productivity and wages), and failing to support young people after the pandemic – didn’t work.

Record of Failure Under the Former Government

Living standards dropped by the largest margin since records began, child poverty hit record levels, NHS waiting lists in England were the highest on record, wages were stagnant, a housing crisis took hold, young people affected by Covid were left on the scrapheap. The history of failure goes on.

A single budget alone can’t fix everything, so Labour has a comprehensive plan for rebuilding and for rewiring the country. And we have to go out and keep making the argument for why our approach will yield benefits.

Welfare Spending and Youth Deprivation

Under the Tories, welfare spending rose substantially. As did child poverty, because they didn’t address the root causes: low pay, high housing costs, deep inequalities in education, health and regions. The state ends up paying more to deal with the effects instead of the cure.

It’s why we are constructing more affordable homes than for a generation, raising wages and new rights for workers, greatly increasing investment in infrastructure and new industries, reducing waiting lists down and bringing down the costs of childcare and energy as we drive for clean power.

Removing the Two-Child Limit

This is also the reason we are absolutely right to use this budget to lift the two-child benefit cap.

For eight long years, since it was introduced, poorer families with children have suffered from a cruel social experiment that was marketed as fair for working people when it was the opposite. Most of the families impacted by it have a parent in work.

It has only served to push 300,000 more children into poverty – which, ultimately, costs us more, as well as being heartless and immoral.

Real Impact in Communities

I know from my own district – where over 5,000 children will be lifted out of poverty as a result of ending the cap – the real impact it’s had. Children wearing £1 wellies as school shoes, children going to bed without food and cold, living in cramped, mouldy homes, parents during the holidays depending on food banks for a simple meal or small gift for their kids.

I also see the impact on schools, teachers, social workers, doctors and charities who are already overburdened but have to divert time and resources to supporting children who are living with the consequences of severe deprivation.

Lasting Effects of Youth Hardship

Just a quarter of pupils from the poorest families achieve five good GCSEs, compared with nearly three in four among wealthier families. This sets them up for the disadvantages they face throughout their lives: missed potential, financial struggles and ill health. Children who grew up in poverty are more likely to be unemployed or poor as adults.

Addressing child poverty isn’t just a ethical duty, it is a long-term investment. Poverty costs the economy significantly more than the three billion pound cost of removing the two-child cap, or extending free school meals.

That’s why we acted urgently in the budget, despite the very difficult economic context. Every day with this cap in place sees over a hundred additional children pushed into poverty. The benefits of lifting it won’t happen overnight either, so taking early action in the parliament was crucial.

The cap was a symbol to 14 years of unsuccessful conservative ideology. Now it is gone.

Fair Financing for Policies

We, as Labour, can also be clear that these initiatives are being paid for in a fair way – from a new gambling levy, closing tax loopholes and a new “mansion tax”.

Conclusion

Equity and direction – that’s how we will win the contest of ideas. This budget is a definitive statement that we gained the election as Labour, and will lead as Labour. As I repeatedly said during my campaign to become deputy leader, we must reclaim the political platform and set the agenda more forcefully about what’s really wrong with the country and how we are fixing it. We’ve definitely done that this week.

So let’s keep hold of it and win this struggle about how we will renew Britain and address the deep inequalities holding us back.

Nicole Fletcher
Nicole Fletcher

A passionate gamer and writer sharing insights on game mechanics and community trends.